Protocol review

What you'll practice

• Check objectives, endpoints, and visit windows against each other
• List findings a study team would have to resolve before start-up
• Separate critical gaps from wording nits
• Write each finding so a coordinator can act on it

Sample input

Preview: a synthetic phase 2 protocol outline. The public excerpt shows the title, one objective, and a visit table header. Eligibility and safety sections stay hidden.

What you'll submit

A findings log with location, issue, priority, and the clarification you want.

Scoring rubric

• Findings · 40 points

  The list catches inconsistencies that are present in the source.

• Priority · 30 points

  Each finding is marked as must-resolve or wording, with a reason.

• Action · 30 points

  The note says what the study team should clarify.

What you receive

A score from 0 to 100, written feedback from a reviewer, and a portfolio record you can share after review.

FAQ